Best Usenet completeness with USENEXT: two backbones instead of one
Retention tells you how long content is kept in the Usenet. Completeness tells you whether it is all still there. If a posting is missing just one article, it can no longer be reassembled. This is where USENEXT has an advantage no other provider has: two independent backbones, Omicron and Abavia. Each one on its own is already well above 99 percent complete — and because their gaps sit in different places, the combination comes close to 100 percent in theory.
2
backbones instead of one
99 %+
completeness per backbone
≈ 100 %
both combined, in theory
1
provider worldwide with this combination
What completeness means
In the Usenet, content is published as postings. A posting is not a single item but a collection of many small articles — originally plain text messages, because the Usenet is a text network. Larger content is split into thousands of such articles and put back together when you retrieve it. Completeness is the share of those articles a provider actually holds and can deliver, usually given as a percentage.
Postings consist of articles
A posting can consist of several thousand articles, spread across a newsgroup. Your newsreader fetches them all and reassembles the content from them.
Given as a percentage
A provider with 99 percent completeness holds ninety-nine out of every hundred articles. That sounds like a small difference, but with large postings it decides between success and failure.
Not the same as retention
Retention is the time axis: how far back content is available. Completeness is how complete things are within that time. Long retention is worth little if the articles inside it have gaps.
One missing article is enough
If an article is missing, the posting is incomplete. Sometimes that can be repaired, sometimes the retrieval fails. Either way it costs you time and data.
Why gaps appear in the first place
The Usenet is not a central archive but a network of servers that pass articles on to each other. Things can get lost along the way — with every provider, and for several reasons at once.
Distribution between servers
An article is posted in one place and has to travel from there to all other servers. If a transfer breaks off or a server is overloaded, the article is missing there for good.
Hardware and load
Storage errors, maintenance windows and spam filters cost articles as well. Large postings are especially vulnerable because they consist of so many parts.
Different neighbourhoods
Every backbone exchanges articles with different partners. Because those neighbourhoods differ, each backbone ends up with different gaps — and that is exactly the opportunity.
Two backbones: Omicron and Abavia
A backbone is the server network where the articles actually live. Almost every Usenet provider is connected to exactly one and therefore inherits its gaps one to one. USENEXT is the only provider worldwide with two backbones: Omicron and Abavia. Each of them on its own is already well above 99 percent complete. What matters, though, is that their gaps sit in different places — taken together, the coverage comes close to 100 percent in theory.
Two separate holdings
Omicron and Abavia hold their articles independently of one another, each well above 99 percent complete. They are not copies of the same storage but two networks in their own right.
The gaps sit elsewhere
Because both backbones source their articles through different partners, different articles are missing from each. What one holding lacks is usually present in the other.
USENEXT asks both
If an article cannot be found in one holding, the other steps in. For you this happens in the background — all you notice is that the download completes.
No extra cost
The double coverage is part of every package. There is no add-on option and no second access you would have to book.
What that means in practice
The percentages are one thing. You notice the difference in four very concrete places.
Fewer failed downloads
Downloads that would fail on a single backbone because of missing articles go through here.
Repair files needed less often
Many postings include PAR2 files that let you reconstruct missing parts. The more complete the source, the less often you need them at all.
Less data used up
Repair blocks have to be downloaded on top and come off your data volume. What arrives complete in the first place costs you nothing extra.
Especially with older content
The further back a posting goes, the more gaps it has typically accumulated. That is exactly where the second holding pays off most clearly.
Try USENEXT for free
Get secure access now and discover the huge world of Usenet. A world just for your taste.
Test for free
Frequently asked questions about completeness
Questions concerning USENEXT?
If you have any questions concerning USENEXT, our support team will be glad to help you. Simply call our support hotline.
Call us:
Online-Support
What others say about USENEXT
Copyright Aviteo GmbH
All rights reserved.